Spend your holiday in Cuba


unidadcubana.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

castro  

It is High Time the US Ended Its Embargo Against Cuba

Since the Cuban revolution took place on Newthe facts which perhaps some want to keep us
Year's eve of 1959 the United States has hadin the dark about. First; Castro did win the
10 Presidents who have had many of the sameelections in Cuba several years before the
ideas while differing on many of which but ifrevolution which the Batista government chose
there be one consistent it was and still isnot to honor so with regards to Castro taking
their repetition of the now ridiculouspower; this in reality one could say was done
expression "Castro will soon fall!". Yes,with the support of the people of Cuba. At
this will eventually happen after all who hasleast back then now weather he still rules
not been born who will or has not alreadywith it is another issue though in Cuba there
died so technically speaking Castro will someis no sign of revolt against him. Second; I
day fall but it will not be because of anspeak not in favor of communism as I have
American embargo which in its 48 years hasseen the damage it can do specially during my
not produced any positive results in eithertime in Poland and have read about all the
bringing an end to Castro's reign oratrocities of Stalin and Mao but again let us
improving the lives in any way shape or formrecall that Batista's Cuba was also a
of the people of Cuba. I would even say alongdictatorship with the basic difference being
with many others that this policy has donethat the American mafia could benefit from
the complete opposite which is to strengthenit.
the position of Fidel Castro's regime as the
average Cuban citizen has no other choice butÂ
to depend on it for everything he or she
needs to survive. Furthermore I can add thatCastro on the other hand for all his
it would be an act of obstinacy rather thenshortcomings in human rights has lead a
anything else that would lead any to continuecountry which has eliminated illiteracy, has
this failed foreign policy as it does nota medical system which is amongst the world's
require much astuteness on anybody's part tobest and this despite of the American embargo
see that if this strategy were going to workand having had Soviet founding cut over 15
it would have done so already and if it hasyears ago. As for change; Cuba is moving
not done so after 48 years then any man orslowly toward a free market by allowing small
woman who has even some use of common senseprivate businesses to emerge much like China.
can  see  that  it  is  not  going  to.ÂI for my own can not help but think of all
the further changes toward a free market and
Âsociety that would have come about if the
United States had seen Cuba in the same light
Sometimes or rather quit often the truth asas they do China or even Vietnam; which in
to why things are done or not is what we neednot only my opinion but that of many others
to look for ourselves specially with regardsare clear examples of what transformations
to politics were it is not always convenientmay  occur  when  embargoes  are not applied.
for those in power to reveal it to us. Let us
look at Cuba, yes it is true they are not aÂ
democratic society and do not even pretend to
be one and we are told this is the reason theIn all this it is fortunate for the people of
United States has resorted to an embargo. OfCuba that the European Union does not have to
course one could seriously argue weather anpamper to the wishes of a select few as they
embargo has ever or will ever produce changesare taking the steps which they should have
anywhere of any kind other then negative onesdone so a long time ago by lifting their
for the people of the country given thatembargo of the island. Naturally this lifting
those in power always manage to get by moreof sanctions brings along strings that come
then nicely. With regards to Cuba's democracyin the form of requiring the Cuban government
or lack of which to this I would say that itto release political prisoners, engage in
is not every government that can maintain thedialogue with their political opposition and
principles of democracy as well as some ofan overall improvement of human rights that
our other trading partners such as China,would include a freer press. I might go
Saudi Arabia, Chile (under Pinochet), Vietnamfurther with this line by claiming that as
and even the Soviet Union. This last countrymuch as I am against the institution which is
being one whom we never had an embargo (otherthe Vatican; I would have to admit though it
then the grain embargo which was quicklypleases me not in the least to do so that the
drooped) against even during the worstlate Pope (John Paul II) brought about more
tensions of the cold war. With regards todemocratic changes in Cuba with one visit
Vietnam, I can give the example of how anthen the American embargo has in 48 years.
American Vietnam Veteran asked if AmericaThis being the case with his visit which lead
does not have an embargo against a countryto some political prisoners being released
like Vietnam; whom we were once at war with,along with churches being allowed to open for
why does it have one against a country whichthe  first  time  since  the  revolution.
technically speaking we were never at war
with? I might even add it was us who tried toÂ
invade Cuba and not the other way around. Â
According to polls taken in recent years and
Âsome even going back as far as the 1992
Presidential elections; most Americans are
This last point brings me to a conclusionopposed to the American embargo on Cuba but
which I feel can not be totally wrong and itit is not most Americans that are deciding
being that if we look at what Cuba has. TheAmerican policy toward Cuba but a small group
answer would be nothing of any real value toof Cuban Americans (some of which have not as
offer the US as what it has is sugar which wemuch as set foot in Cuba) living mostly in
can produce ourselves or buy somewhere elseFlorida who have been given the undeserved
very cheaply. For instance The Dominicanright to dictate American policy toward Cuba
Republican which was even known to use childsimply because they come from this country. I
labor to in its production of the samesay undeserved because if we look at history
commodity. Cuba has beautiful beaches which Idid any other ethnic group ever get to decide
hope to visit one day even if my countryAmerican foreign policy toward the nation
(much to what should be the shame ofthey came from? Did German Americans get to
Americans) does not lift its embargo but thendecide American policy toward Germany during
again it is not like Americans do not haveW.W. I or W.W. II or did Russian Americans
beaches in the US or other nearby Caribbeanget the same privilege with regards to the
countries. Cigars is another thing Cuba hasSoviet Union or did Vietnamese Americans or
to offer; which based upon my knowledgethose who came from Vietnam get to do
though not experience are reported to be thelikewise with regards to American policy
best in world but again as is the case withtoward the country they had left? They did
sugar; it is not that this a product which isnot and theirs was an opinion that was not
all that vital to our economy and which weeven requested so I enquire why should Cuban
could not get in another country (thoughAmericans get to decide the policy of our
perhaps not of the same quality) likenation as a whole toward their country of
Jamaica.origin when other ethnic groups did not
receive the same privilege. Also taking in to
Âaccount that American foreign policy toward
Cuba does not only effect Cuban Americans but
Once we eliminate these three items Cuba hasall  Americans.
little to offer the American economy however
I ask if they had oil as does Saudi Arabia orÂ
a huge population with costs of labor being
dirt cheap as they are in China; would weThis boils down to the real issue as to the
then be overlooking their human rights recordreality of this absurd embargo's raison
or lack of democracy as we conveniently do sod'être which is to obtain the votes of
with the above mentioned countries? This is athose Cuban Americans living in Florida that
question which at best can be retorted withare crucial to any candidate wishing to win
an educated guess which would come in thethis vital state. I for my part claim to be
affirmative.Âof the notion that if not for a voting system
(Electoral College) which is even more
Âantiquated and senseless then the embargo I
argue against; the issue would be decided by
Some would say another reason for the embargoour nation as a whole who would be allowed to
is the "Cuban Missile Crisis" but this lacksdebate the matter. Instead of a handful of
as much sense as the embargo does because ifCuban Americans who from my point of view
we look at the events that lead up to thisseem more concerned with being vengeful
crisis it was the Soviet Union puttingagainst their country of origin then in
missiles in Cuba that created it. Cuba merelybringing about real change. I however do not
allowed its territory to be used for thisdeny that there might be some Cuban Americans
purpose. A decision which perhaps might havewho wish well for their country. Therefore it
even been forced on Castro as the Sovietsis to those who truly want democracy in Cuba
were not ones to give their satellites muchas opposed to those who simply want a regime
in the way of options as was the case withchange so they might get their hands on some
countries like Poland, Czechoslovakia,cheap land before the price goes up that I
Hungary, the DDR, Romania and Bulgaria. Wesay that history has made it clear that the
may speculate weather or not Castro willinglyway to bring about change is not embargoes or
went along with Khrushchev on that one butsanctions but negotiations which should not
let us claim that for all intensive purposes,be  confused  with  appeasement.
since we have not concrete proof otherwise
that he did so on his own free will. If thisÂ
was the case then why place an embargo on
only the country that allowed missiles to beIn conclusion I will say that if one thing I
put on their territory aimed at us and notshare with those who desire to prolong
the country that actually put those missilesAmerica's embargo on Cuba; it is that I like
there in first place. Of coarse alwaysthey wish to see the end of Castro's
bearing in mind that we too had missiles ofcommunist dictatorship but unlike them I feel
our own aimed at the Soviet Union, also fromthe way to go about it is another. Dialog
countries which were close to them such asinstead of sanctions or embargoes is what not
Turkey  and  West  Germany.only I but millions through out the United
States are calling for and yet our voices are
Ânot being heard simply because we contrary to
those who wish to continue the embargo can
As for the Castro's government many thingsnot vote in Florida.
can be said against it but let us not forget



1 A B C 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93