It is High Time the US Ended Its Embargo Against Cuba

Since the Cuban revolution took place on New Year'sperhaps some want to keep us in the dark about.
eve of 1959 the United States has had 10 PresidentsFirst; Castro did win the elections in Cuba several
who have had many of the same ideas whileyears before the revolution which the Batista
differing on many of which but if there be onegovernment chose not to honor so with regards to
consistent it was and still is their repetition of theCastro taking power; this in reality one could say was
now ridiculous expression "Castro will soon fall!". Yes,done with the support of the people of Cuba. At
this will eventually happen after all who has not beenleast back then now weather he still rules with it is
born who will or has not already died so technicallyanother issue though in Cuba there is no sign of
speaking Castro will some day fall but it will not berevolt against him. Second; I speak not in favor of
because of an American embargo which in its 48communism as I have seen the damage it can do
years has not produced any positive results in eitherspecially during my time in Poland and have read
bringing an end to Castro's reign or improving theabout all the atrocities of Stalin and Mao but again let
lives in any way shape or form of the people ofus recall that Batista's Cuba was also a dictatorship
Cuba. I would even say along with many others thatwith the basic difference being that the American
this policy has done the complete opposite which ismafia could benefit from it.
to strengthen the position of Fidel Castro's regime asÂ
the average Cuban citizen has no other choice but toCastro on the other hand for all his shortcomings in
depend on it for everything he or she needs tohuman rights has lead a country which has eliminated
survive. Furthermore I can add that it would be anilliteracy, has a medical system which is amongst the
act of obstinacy rather then anything else that wouldworld's best and this despite of the American
lead any to continue this failed foreign policy as itembargo and having had Soviet founding cut over 15
does not require much astuteness on anybody's partyears ago. As for change; Cuba is moving slowly
to see that if this strategy were going to work ittoward a free market by allowing small private
would have done so already and if it has not done sobusinesses to emerge much like China. I for my own
after 48 years then any man or woman who hascan not help but think of all the further changes
even some use of common sense can see that it istoward a free market and society that would have
not going to.Âcome about if the United States had seen Cuba in
Âthe same light as they do China or even Vietnam;
Sometimes or rather quit often the truth as to whywhich in not only my opinion but that of many others
things are done or not is what we need to look forare clear examples of what transformations may
ourselves specially with regards to politics were it isoccur when embargoes are not applied.
not always convenient for those in power to reveal itÂ
to us. Let us look at Cuba, yes it is true they are notIn all this it is fortunate for the people of Cuba that
a democratic society and do not even pretend to bethe European Union does not have to pamper to the
one and we are told this is the reason the Unitedwishes of a select few as they are taking the steps
States has resorted to an embargo. Of course onewhich they should have done so a long time ago by
could seriously argue weather an embargo has everlifting their embargo of the island. Naturally this lifting
or will ever produce changes anywhere of any kindof sanctions brings along strings that come in the
other then negative ones for the people of theform of requiring the Cuban government to release
country given that those in power always manage topolitical prisoners, engage in dialogue with their political
get by more then nicely. With regards to Cuba'sopposition and an overall improvement of human
democracy or lack of which to this I would say thatrights that would include a freer press. I might go
it is not every government that can maintain thefurther with this line by claiming that as much as I am
principles of democracy as well as some of our otheragainst the institution which is the Vatican; I would
trading partners such as China, Saudi Arabia, Chilehave to admit though it pleases me not in the least
(under Pinochet), Vietnam and even the Soviet Union.to do so that the late Pope (John Paul II) brought
This last country being one whom we never had anabout more democratic changes in Cuba with one
embargo (other then the grain embargo which wasvisit then the American embargo has in 48 years.
quickly drooped) against even during the worstThis being the case with his visit which lead to some
tensions of the cold war. With regards to Vietnam, Ipolitical prisoners being released along with churches
can give the example of how an American Vietnambeing allowed to open for the first time since the
Veteran asked if America does not have an embargorevolution.
against a country like Vietnam; whom we were onceÂ
at war with, why does it have one against a countryAccording to polls taken in recent years and some
which technically speaking we were never at wareven going back as far as the 1992 Presidential
with? I might even add it was us who tried to invadeelections; most Americans are opposed to the
Cuba and not the other way around. ÂAmerican embargo on Cuba but it is not most
ÂAmericans that are deciding American policy toward
This last point brings me to a conclusion which I feelCuba but a small group of Cuban Americans (some of
can not be totally wrong and it being that if we lookwhich have not as much as set foot in Cuba) living
at what Cuba has. The answer would be nothing ofmostly in Florida who have been given the
any real value to offer the US as what it has is sugarundeserved right to dictate American policy toward
which we can produce ourselves or buy somewhereCuba simply because they come from this country. I
else very cheaply. For instance The Dominicansay undeserved because if we look at history did
Republican which was even known to use child laborany other ethnic group ever get to decide American
to in its production of the same commodity. Cubaforeign policy toward the nation they came from?
has beautiful beaches which I hope to visit one dayDid German Americans get to decide American policy
even if my country (much to what should be thetoward Germany during W.W. I or W.W. II or did
shame of Americans) does not lift its embargo butRussian Americans get the same privilege with
then again it is not like Americans do not haveregards to the Soviet Union or did Vietnamese
beaches in the US or other nearby CaribbeanAmericans or those who came from Vietnam get to
countries. Cigars is another thing Cuba has to offer;do likewise with regards to American policy toward
which based upon my knowledge though notthe country they had left? They did not and theirs
experience are reported to be the best in world butwas an opinion that was not even requested so I
again as is the case with sugar; it is not that this aenquire why should Cuban Americans get to decide
product which is all that vital to our economy andthe policy of our nation as a whole toward their
which we could not get in another country (thoughcountry of origin when other ethnic groups did not
perhaps not of the same quality) like Jamaica.receive the same privilege. Also taking in to account
Âthat American foreign policy toward Cuba does not
Once we eliminate these three items Cuba has littleonly effect Cuban Americans but all Americans.
to offer the American economy however I ask ifÂ
they had oil as does Saudi Arabia or a hugeThis boils down to the real issue as to the reality of
population with costs of labor being dirt cheap asthis absurd embargo's raison d'être which is to
they are in China; would we then be overlooking theirobtain the votes of those Cuban Americans living in
human rights record or lack of democracy as weFlorida that are crucial to any candidate wishing to
conveniently do so with the above mentionedwin this vital state. I for my part claim to be of the
countries? This is a question which at best can benotion that if not for a voting system (Electoral
retorted with an educated guess which would comeCollege) which is even more antiquated and senseless
in the affirmative.Âthen the embargo I argue against; the issue would be
Âdecided by our nation as a whole who would be
Some would say another reason for the embargo isallowed to debate the matter. Instead of a handful
the "Cuban Missile Crisis" but this lacks as much senseof Cuban Americans who from my point of view
as the embargo does because if we look at theseem more concerned with being vengeful against
events that lead up to this crisis it was the Soviettheir country of origin then in bringing about real
Union putting missiles in Cuba that created it. Cubachange. I however do not deny that there might be
merely allowed its territory to be used for thissome Cuban Americans who wish well for their
purpose. A decision which perhaps might have evencountry. Therefore it is to those who truly want
been forced on Castro as the Soviets were not onesdemocracy in Cuba as opposed to those who simply
to give their satellites much in the way of options aswant a regime change so they might get their hands
was the case with countries like Poland,on some cheap land before the price goes up that I
Czechoslovakia, Hungary, the DDR, Romania andsay that history has made it clear that the way to
Bulgaria. We may speculate weather or not Castrobring about change is not embargoes or sanctions but
willingly went along with Khrushchev on that one butnegotiations which should not be confused with
let us claim that for all intensive purposes, since weappeasement.
have not concrete proof otherwise that he did so onÂ
his own free will. If this was the case then why placeIn conclusion I will say that if one thing I share with
an embargo on only the country that allowed missilesthose who desire to prolong America's embargo on
to be put on their territory aimed at us and not theCuba; it is that I like they wish to see the end of
country that actually put those missiles there in firstCastro's communist dictatorship but unlike them I feel
place. Of coarse always bearing in mind that we toothe way to go about it is another. Dialog instead of
had missiles of our own aimed at the Soviet Union,sanctions or embargoes is what not only I but millions
also from countries which were close to them suchthrough out the United States are calling for and yet
as Turkey and West Germany.our voices are not being heard simply because we
Âcontrary to those who wish to continue the embargo
As for the Castro's government many things can becan not vote in Florida.
said against it but let us not forget the facts which