| Huberman and Sweezy, the Marxist Critics, have | | | | Fruit Co. organized a complaint against for the sum of |
| made an analysis of the land reform of the Alliance | | | | $16 million in opposition to government of Guatemala |
| for Progress and have proved that it had no | | | | for unlawfully expropriated lands. The argument was |
| probability for success. The city bourgeoisie of Latin | | | | finally settled at the time the United States dropped |
| America would not give up its' spots easily; in its | | | | the assumed policy and the land has been returned |
| place, a more practical step was required to give a | | | | to the company United Fruit. A comparable land |
| impulse to the nonviolent revolution. A perfect | | | | improvement has been started in Cuba which was as |
| example to this point that was made by the two | | | | well doomed to crash. In 1959, the Agrarian Reform |
| researchers is the agrarian agenda that was accepted | | | | forbidden anyone from holding over 995 acres of |
| in Guatemala from 1952 till 1953. These two man | | | | farm lands and 3,316 of ranch ones. Recompense for |
| which have made a decision to carry out the reform | | | | the property has been given out in the mode of |
| belonged to social democrats of a middle class, | | | | twenty-year bonds through 4% annual interests. |
| where the aim was 200,00 acres of unfarmed land | | | | Later in the same year, a message has been |
| possessed by the United Fruit Co. The Government | | | | delivered to the administration in Cuba that affirmed |
| of Guatemala determined the fee for the land, which | | | | that even supposing that the U.S. grounds could have |
| was about $3.6 million for the ground in twenty-five | | | | been confiscated, and adequate recompense should |
| year unions with 3% annually, that was the objective | | | | have gone after, but it never did. |
| price of the land in 1952. In spite of this, the United | | | | |