| The program which was once set with the Alliance | | | | be more traditional and aggressive in nature. This |
| for Progress was soon repeated for Cuba by the | | | | issue becomes obvious after taking a nearer insight |
| Association of the Foreign Policy in 1930s and in | | | | on the agenda of land rearrangement on the land of |
| 1950by the World Bank. It became obvious, that | | | | Mexico. Furthermore, redistribution of the land in this |
| countries of Latin America required a very powerful | | | | country was the primary policy on the program |
| push to demonstrate a development considering the | | | | throughout early 1900s. During the period of 1924 - |
| aims set by Alliance for Progress and the early | | | | 1930, Mexican President Cardenas has undertaken the |
| economic and social conditions crosswise the | | | | strategy of land redistribution. Nevertheless, with the |
| continent. The opening stage of achievement of the | | | | end of his term, the plan was doomed to crash. The |
| Alliance did not have to be a great inflow of the U.S. | | | | Party of Revolutionary Industries, which was the only |
| funds. It was dangerous for counties of Latin | | | | authoritative party for the former 30 years, plainly |
| America to modify the structure of territory | | | | banned the Mexican Revolution. In 1950, this party |
| ownership. In spite of the many efforts to reorganize | | | | clearly stated that the procedure of land distribution |
| "latifundia", all of them were never successful. Unless | | | | and the idea of class tussle were not effective; in |
| reorganization of land had taken spot, the necessary | | | | their place, the strategy that was perfect for "middle |
| minimum economic circumstances for accomplishment | | | | class" population has been implemented. By that time, |
| of the Alliance would not have been recognized. To | | | | less than 1% of inhabitants occupied not more than |
| make the policy of land rearrangement in Latin | | | | 76% of the whole farmland while 46.6 percent of |
| America more effective, the US foreign policy had to | | | | the population being landless. |