War on Terror Breeds Legal Challenges

Al-Qaida conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui remains thesome of its intelligence sources as it presents
only person convicted in connection with theevidence. Prosecutors would also have to address
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Others whowhether torture was used to obtain confessions.
allegedly planned the 9/11 attacks are being held byNeal Katyal, a law professor at Georgetown
the U.S. abroad. But as of now, there are no plans toUniversity Law Center in Washington, believes the
put them on trial.Bush administration would prefer to simply detain
Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison after hesome of the terror suspects indefinitely.
pled guilty to conspiring with al-Qaida to fly planes"I think the federal courts have given the president a
into buildings.fairly robust power to detain enemy combatants and
But what about some of the alleged planners of theI think they are likely to continue to do that," said
9/11 attacks now in custody, like Khalid SheikhNeal Katyal. "And so, folks like Khalid Sheik
Mohammed or Ramzi Binalshibh, who allegedlyMohammed, I think, are going to be detained
financed the 19 hijackers on September 11.indefinitely. And given that backdrop, it seems unwise
U.S. officials say that despite the lengthy andto bring a prosecution in which the results may be
challenging prosecution of Zacarias Moussaoui, criminalacquittal," he said.
prosecution remains an option.The Bush administration could also decide to try
"The Moussaoui case, I think, demonstrates that wesome of the al-Qaida suspects in military
can be successful," said Paul McNulty, the deputy U.S.commissions, also known as military tribunals.
attorney general. "In our investigations, we willProfessor Katyal represents Salim Ahmed Hamdan,
continue to use every tool and authority available tonow awaiting trial as an enemy combatant at the U.S.
us to identify risks at the earliest stage possible. Andnaval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
in deciding whether to prosecute, we will not wait toHamdan is challenging the Bush administration's right
see what becomes of risks."to try terror suspects through military tribunals
During the court proceedings Moussaoui was knownbefore the U.S. Supreme Court.
for his disruptive outbursts in court and taunting"And he can sue the President of the United States,
relatives of victims who had testified.the most powerful man on earth, in the highest court
Legal experts and others wonder if the difficulties onof the land," Katyal said. "That is something that in
display in the Moussaoui case are making it less likelyany other country, I think I would have to fear for
that the government will want to try the allegedmy life and I think Hamdan would have to fear for
masterminds of the 9/11 attacks in open court.his. It is something remarkably American about our
Benjamin Wittes has written editorials about the issuesystem."
in the Washington Post newspaper. He spoke at aThe Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision
forum on the issue sponsored by the Americanbefore the end of June on the legality of the military
Enterprise Institute in Washington.commissions.
"I mean, these are the people we have identified andWhile it remains unclear what the United States will
are in our custody and there seems to be no plansdo with the alleged high profile al-Qaida members in
whatsoever to bring them to trial," said Wittes.custody, prosecutions of lower-level suspects
Trying terrorist suspects in open court could be riskycontinue.
because the government might be forced to reveal